The user, a 21-year-old woman who is seven months pregnant, describes a conflict that arose with her 32-year-old husband regarding post-birth plans. She notes that her husband has been generally supportive throughout the pregnancy, attending appointments and helping with household chores, which she appreciates.
However, the husband recently proposed the idea of taking a “dad-cation,” a short vacation with his friends immediately following the baby’s arrival, claiming he needs to unwind. The user strongly objected, pointing out that she will be physically recovering from childbirth, breastfeeding, and handling the immediate care. When she called the idea selfish, the husband became defensive, stating he deserves a break too because of his support during the pregnancy, leaving the user questioning if she is overreacting.

AITA for telling my husband his request for a “dad-cation” after the baby is born is completely selfish? π€°π‘πΆβοΈ













Dr. Avery James, a specialist in family systems theory, is known for noting, “The transition to parenthood is a period of extreme vulnerability for the primary caregiver, and demands for equal time off immediately following birth often reflect a fundamental misunderstanding of postpartum recovery and infant needs.”
The husband’s motivation appears rooted in anticipating stress and seeking immediate relief, potentially viewing his pregnancy support as a service that now entitles him to a reward or respite. This viewpoint minimizes the significant physical and emotional labor of childbirth and the acute demands of the first few weeks of newborn care, which overwhelmingly fall to the birthing parent. While fathers certainly need breaks and support, requesting a standalone vacation immediately following birth neglects the reality of the fourth trimester.
The OP’s reaction, while emotionally charged, is grounded in practical necessity and self-preservation. A more constructive path forward would involve negotiating an alternative time frame for his break, perhaps a long weekend several weeks after the birth once the initial feeding and recovery routines are established, rather than an immediate departure.
REDDIT USERS WERE STUNNED β YOU WONβT BELIEVE SOME OF THESE REACTIONS.










The original poster (OP) is struggling between acknowledging her husband’s past support during her pregnancy and feeling that his request for an immediate post-birth vacation is inappropriate and selfish given her physical recovery and the demands of a newborn. The central conflict revolves around differing expectations regarding immediate parental responsibility versus personal decompression time.
Is the OP correct in refusing the “dad-cation” outright due to the critical nature of the newborn phase, or is the husband justified in feeling he deserves a break shortly after the birth, even if the timing is difficult?







