Take a look at the comments from fellow users:
NTA. When you sell something it is your responsibility to know or determine what it’s worth, not the person you are selling to.
Edit – to your edit I absolutely agree.
ESH. You blatantly took advantage of him and his ignorance. He sucks because he didn’t research it enough, and then harassed you and your wife to the point it got him fired. Just a whole messy situation. I don’t think you should sell it back to him. You paid a price he gave you (bad on him). You just seriously took advantage of him (bad on you).
ESH. Harassing you and your wife is not okay whatsoever regardless of circumstance. But let’s be real, you did prey on his ignorance and took advantage of it, which makes you suck, too.
Harsh lesson for the guy (double whammy in losing something of value AND going crazy and being fired in the process). He’s an idiot because he should have done his research. You on the other hand, will justify in your head why you think you’re in the right and won’t lose any sleep over it.
But consider this: insider trading is wrong because of information asymmetry – someone profits because of others’ ignorance. You profited from this asymmetry. Granted, not illegal, but if it were me, I would feel guilty taking that kind of advantage. This is $46K we’re talking about.
I’m a bit conflicted because it seems there may be more to the story but I’m gonna say YTA. You knew what it was worth and blatantly ripped the guy off.
He just lost his dad and was probably having a hard time and just wanting to unload stuff. You could have leveled with the guy and told him the truth.
YTA. I can’t believe how many votes on here for the opposite! This guy sold his late dad’s possession in good faith and you took advantage. What a shitty thing to do, you should have told him what it was worth.
YTA. 100{39ca6eb452c0ce4419cd73a8f3bd18a23fe95ab4febb092bc2ab1b542eeea82f} without question that was an asshole move, doesn’t mean you have to give it back. The non-asshole move would be to tell him its value before purchasing.
I feel like this thread highlights the dissonance between reality and Reddit extremely well. How can someone possibly think this is the morally right thing to do? YTA, that was really low.
YTA. There’s a legal aspect and a moral aspect to this. From a moral standpoint, yeah, they should have done better research. But you knowingly took advantage of a grieving co-worker, to the tune of tens of thousands of dollars of their inheritance. That’s just an asshole thing to do.
I vote NTA. Yeah, it really sucks for them, but they should have done a better job researching the value.
This could fuel an ethics class discussion. What you did was opportunistic. Some people value that, others see it as taking advantage. It depends on your ethics. But ultimately, you benefited from someone else’s ignorance. For that, YTA.







