The user, a 22-year-old woman (OP), was using the pool area at her apartment complex to tan and study during a quiet morning period. She was lying on her stomach with her bikini top untied to avoid back tan lines, ensuring that no intimate parts were exposed, as her position made exposure unavoidable regardless of the ties.
A woman arrived with her children and chose a lounge chair directly next to the OP. This woman then scolded the OP for having her bikini top untied in front of her children, leading to a brief, hostile exchange where the OP suggested she move. The OP is now questioning whether she was wrong for her choice of attire arrangement in a public, albeit shared, amenity space.

AITAH for untying my bikini top at a public pool?









According to Dr. Jules Murphy, a specialist in community boundary dynamics, “Shared communal spaces require a delicate balance between individual autonomy and collective comfort, often leading to friction when personal comfort choices intersect with perceived public decency standards.”
The OP’s action of untying her bikini top was clearly for personal comfort related to tanning, not intended as a public display, as she was positioned such that parts would be exposed regardless of the tie status. However, in a space frequented by families, actions that could be interpreted as immodest by some, particularly when children are present, often draw criticism. The visiting mother’s reaction, while immediate and aggressive (calling the OP an ‘asshole’), stems from a protective instinct regarding her children’s exposure, leading her to enforce her personal boundary standards onto the OP.
While the OP was well within her rights to use the pool as intended, acknowledging the social context of shared housing environments is crucial for conflict reduction. A professional recommendation would be for the OP to continue enjoying the amenity but perhaps consider using a different part of the pool area or a towel wrap if she anticipates sharing the space with families, as preemptive adjustment can often prevent unnecessary confrontation, even if the OP is technically ‘correct’ in her actions.
THE COMMENTS SECTION WENT WILD – REDDIT HAD *A LOT* TO SAY ABOUT THIS ONE.













The core conflict involves a clash between the OP’s expectation of privacy and personal comfort in using a shared amenity space and the visiting mother’s expectation that public behavior, especially near children, must adhere to stricter, more conservative standards of dress.
The central question remains whether the OP violated a social norm regarding modesty in a shared community pool area, or if the visiting mother overstepped by imposing her standards on another adult who was not intentionally exposing herself, thus leaving the OP to decide if she should alter her behavior for the comfort of others.







