The Original Poster (OP) and their husband recently had their offer accepted on a new house, leading to excitement as they began sharing the good news with their social circle. Shortly after the announcement, a close friend and his wife, who are planning to attend school in the same state, asked if they could move in with the OP immediately upon closing for an entire year.
The OP felt an immediate internal resistance to the request, especially since the friends did not mention contributing financially through rent or groceries. While the OP fears the confrontation and feeling like a ‘huge asshole’ for refusing, they are also concerned about settling into their first home while immediately sharing it with others without any established boundaries. The OP’s central dilemma is whether to agree to this potentially overwhelming request or to establish firm boundaries early on.

We got an offer on a house, our friends asked if they can move in








According to Dr. Skyler Gray, a specialist in interpersonal boundaries, “The first few months of cohabitation, especially in a new living situation, require established agreements on roles, finances, and personal space; bypassing this initial structure guarantees future conflict.”
The friend’s request appears to place a significant, uncompensated burden on the OP and her husband during a critical transition period. Their immediate assumption that the OP’s new home is available for free lodging suggests a lack of consideration for the OP’s status as a first-time homeowner taking on new financial responsibilities. The OP’s hesitation regarding the confrontation is a common reaction rooted in conflict avoidance, where the short-term relief of saying ‘no’ is outweighed by the fear of long-term social fallout.
Professionally, the OP is correct to be hesitant. Introducing guests for an indefinite period, particularly ones who plan to stay a full year without offering financial support, fundamentally changes the dynamic of the household before it even begins. The recommended path forward is a polite but firm refusal that emphasizes the need for the OP and husband to settle in first, followed by an open discussion about what a future, temporary arrangement might look like, provided clear financial terms are agreed upon.
HERE’S HOW REDDIT BLEW UP AFTER HEARING THIS – PEOPLE COULDN’T BELIEVE IT.
:- >



















The OP is currently caught between the desire to maintain a positive friendship and the practical need to establish a stable, private environment in their new home as first-time owners. Their discomfort stems from the friend’s perceived expectation of free accommodation, which conflicts directly with the OP’s need for personal space and time to settle in.
The situation forces a decision between avoiding immediate social discomfort and prioritizing the long-term well-being and financial security of their new household. Readers must weigh the value of preserving the friendship against the necessity of setting clear, early boundaries regarding shared living arrangements and financial contributions.







