A family member has recently been convicted and jailed for a serious sex crime after the victim reported the incident following several years. Because the family member pleaded guilty, there is no debate about whether the crime occurred.
As this family member faces a potential sentence of up to eight years, their absence from family gatherings and visits from their spouse is becoming increasingly clear to the children and other relatives. The spouse is limiting disclosure of the conviction and insists that the reasons for the absence must remain secret, leading the original poster (OP) to question whether they should inform their two eldest daughters, aged 18 and 16, about the truth.
AITA for wanting to tell my kids about a family member convicted of a sex crime
As renowned child psychologist Dr. Gabor Maté explains, “The truth, however difficult, is always preferable to secrecy, especially when dealing with children and adolescents, as secrecy breeds anxiety and distrust.”
This situation involves a collision between family loyalty, the need to manage difficult facts, and the developmental needs of older adolescents. The spouse’s insistence on secrecy likely stems from shame, a desire to control the narrative, or a misguided attempt to ‘protect’ the children. However, for daughters aged 16 and 18, withholding foundational information about a major figure in their extended family structure—especially when the absence is noticeable—is likely counterproductive. Adolescents are highly attuned to inconsistencies; the silence surrounding the family member’s disappearance creates a vacuum that can be filled with speculation, fear, and damaged trust in the parents who are keeping the secret.
The OP’s inclination to tell the truth is generally appropriate, given the daughters’ ages. While the details of the crime may need careful phrasing, the fact of incarceration for a serious offense should be communicated. Moving forward, the OP should prioritize honest, age-appropriate communication over maintaining external secrecy, perhaps by framing the conversation around boundaries, accountability, and the family’s commitment to supporting the victim while processing the difficult reality of the conviction.
REDDIT USERS WERE STUNNED – YOU WON’T BELIEVE SOME OF THESE REACTIONS.
The original poster is currently navigating a difficult conflict between the desire to protect their children from painful truths and the belief that their older daughters deserve honest information regarding a significant change in their extended family structure.
The central question is whether the OP should uphold the spouse’s request for secrecy regarding the conviction, or if the age and maturity of the 18- and 16-year-old daughters warrant full disclosure of the serious criminal nature of the family member’s absence.
