A father, standing at the crossroads of his life, chooses to pen down his unspoken words, memories, and wisdom in a journal meant to be a lasting gift for his children. In the quiet reflection of his 57 years, he seeks to create a bridge between his present and an unknown future, hoping to leave behind a legacy filled with love and guidance—something he never received from his own parents.
Yet, this intimate act of vulnerability is met with unease and misunderstanding from his children, who see the journal not as a treasure, but as a shadow of impending loss. Torn between his desire to share his heart and their fear of mortality, he grapples with doubt, questioning if his attempt to connect has instead sown anxiety and distance.

AITA for writing a journal for my kids about life after I’m gone, even though they say it’s “too much”?






As renowned grief counselor Dr. Alan Wolfelt explains, “Grief is a natural process that occurs when we lose something or someone of significance. Anticipatory grief, which can occur when we sense a future loss, is often complex and deeply personal.”
The OP is engaging in a form of legacy work, often associated with addressing existential concerns as one ages. This is a healthy coping mechanism for reflecting on life and imparting values. However, the timing and medium—a guided journal—can easily trigger anticipatory grief or anxiety in observers, particularly adult children who may not be emotionally prepared to process their parent’s mortality, even abstractly. The daughter’s reaction suggests an emotional barrier where confronting the idea of the father’s absence is too overwhelming right now, interpreting his proactive measure as a confirmation of impending loss rather than a planned act of love.
The son’s reaction focuses more on enjoying the present, reflecting a different coping strategy where avoidance or present-moment focus is preferred over future planning. The OP’s actions were not inherently wrong, as they stem from a place of love and foresight. A constructive recommendation would be for the OP to clearly communicate the journal’s intent—emphasizing it is a preparation for life’s uncertainties, not a prediction of immediate death—and perhaps store the journal privately until a more appropriate time, such as when they are ill or as a gift upon a significant future milestone, thereby respecting both their need to create and their children’s need for present emotional security.
THIS STORY SHOOK THE INTERNET – AND REDDITORS DIDN’T HOLD BACK.





















The original poster (OP) is experiencing internal conflict after initiating a personal project intended as a legacy gift, which was met with anxiety and discomfort by their adult children. The central conflict lies between the OP’s desire to proactively document meaningful thoughts and advice for the future versus the children’s perception that this action is morbid or premature, leading the OP to doubt their intentions.
Given the clash between the father’s need for legacy planning and the children’s emotional reaction, is the OP wrong for pursuing a deeply personal project meant for the future, even if it causes temporary unease for their living children, or should the OP prioritize his children’s current comfort over his own desire to create this planned legacy?







