She dreamed of a simple, joyful day with her daughter—a mommy-daughter outing filled with laughter and love. But when money was tight, hope came from the smallest place: her daughter’s piggy bank, a symbol of saving and innocence. What should have been a tender moment was shattered before it even began.
Her father, a man consumed by addiction even in his final days, stole that fragile hope, taking the change meant for her child’s happiness. The betrayal cut deep, reopening old wounds of a childhood shadowed by loss and desperation, where trust was a luxury and survival meant hiding what little you had.
My dad stole my kids piggy bank money so I stole his license plate. Am I the a**hole ?
As renowned researcher Dr. Brené Brown explains, “Boundaries are the distance at which I can love you and me simultaneously.” This situation highlights a severe breakdown of boundaries, exacerbated by addiction and terminal illness. The OP’s father, due to active addiction, is prioritizing immediate gratification (drugs or the immediate value of the change) over basic ethical conduct, even while terminally ill. The OP’s reaction—removing the license plate—suggests a profound, unresolved trauma from her childhood where her own efforts to protect her belongings were repeatedly violated by her father.
The OP’s action moves beyond seeking simple restitution; it appears to be a desperate, retaliatory attempt to finally enforce a boundary that was never respected in the past, now projected onto her child’s experience. While her anger regarding the theft is understandable, involving law enforcement potential by removing the plate creates a dangerous power dynamic, especially given the father’s hospice status and existing warrants. This action shifts the dynamic from a family issue of theft to a legal crisis, placing immense pressure on the grandmother who is likely acting as a primary caregiver.
The OP’s action was an inappropriate escalation given the context of her father’s terminal condition and hospice care. A more constructive approach would have been direct, non-retaliatory confrontation with the grandmother regarding restitution for the child, perhaps involving mediation or a clear statement about future contact, rather than escalating the situation to a level that could endanger the father’s remaining time or cause legal jeopardy.
AFTER THIS STORY DROPPED, REDDIT WENT INTO MELTDOWN MODE – CHECK OUT WHAT PEOPLE SAID.
The original poster (OP) experienced deep emotional pain seeing her daughter’s savings stolen by her dying father, an action that mirrored her own childhood experiences with his theft. Her reaction involved taking punitive action against her father’s vehicle, leading to significant conflict with her grandmother, who is focused on her father’s terminal condition and potential legal consequences.
Was the OP justified in taking direct, potentially illegal action (removing the license plate) to address the theft of her child’s money, or was this an overreaction that unfairly endangered her terminally ill father and caused distress to her grandmother? Should the focus remain on accountability for the theft or on compassionate caregiving during hospice?
