Two sisters, scarred by years of manipulation and narcissism from their father, face an impossible choice. After bravely severing ties for their own mental health, they grapple with the painful reality that their family refuses to accept them without submission to the very source of their trauma.
Determined to rise above the bitterness, they attempt to bridge the gap by attending Thanksgiving with their father’s side, only to be met with cold ultimatums and conditional love. In this fractured family, loyalty is demanded at the cost of their healing, leaving the sisters to confront the heartbreaking truth of where they truly belong.
AITA for not going to Thanksgiving on my dad’s side of the family?
Psychologist Dr. Ramani Durvasula, known for her work on narcissistic abuse, often emphasizes that maintaining boundaries is crucial for recovery when dealing with narcissistic family members. She states, “Boundaries are not rules for other people; they are guidelines for how you will take care of yourself.” In this scenario, the grandparents’ ultimatum effectively weaponized the Thanksgiving gathering, forcing the sisters to choose between their established need for distance from abuse and their desire to support their immediate family unit (mother and brother).
The sisters’ initial motivation to attend Thanksgiving stemmed from a desire to ‘be the bigger people,’ which suggests a high degree of people-pleasing or an investment in maintaining the appearance of family unity, even at personal cost. When the grandparents imposed a condition—contacting the father—the sisters correctly identified that this request violated the core reason they cut him off: mental health and wellbeing. Their reaction to withdraw was a necessary defense mechanism, reinforcing their boundaries against relational coercion.
The negative impact on the mother highlights a common dynamic in families affected by a high-conflict or narcissistic individual: the ‘peacekeeper’ (the mother) often suffers the most as children establish their autonomy. While the sisters’ actions were appropriate for protecting themselves from abuse, a constructive future recommendation involves clearer, less defensive communication with the brother and mother, framing the boundary not as an attack on them, but as a necessary act of self-preservation that should not diminish their love for the rest of the family. They could try to reassure the mother they are open to other ways of showing support that do not involve engaging with the father.
AFTER THIS STORY DROPPED, REDDIT WENT INTO MELTDOWN MODE – CHECK OUT WHAT PEOPLE SAID.
The original poster and her sister prioritized maintaining firm personal boundaries established after cutting off an abusive father, leading to conflict with extended family who demanded reconciliation as a condition for attendance at a holiday gathering. This decision, while protective of their mental health, has caused distress to their supportive mother and strained the relationship with their brother, who sides with the father.
Given the intense emotional fallout on the mother and the division among siblings, should the two older sisters have compromised their established boundaries regarding contact with their manipulative father for the sake of familial peace during the holiday, or was maintaining personal safety and integrity the non-negotiable priority?
