He once poured his whole heart into a love that promised forever, only to find it slowly slipping away as the intimacy they shared vanished without warning. The change in her body, a silent and unseen battle, left him isolated in a relationship where connection became a distant memory, and his own desire faded into nothingness.
Now, years later, he grapples with the aching void between them and the weight of uncertainty pressing down on his future. Surrounded by friends building families, he faces the painful truth that love alone may not be enough to sustain a life shadowed by an unyielding struggle, leaving him torn between devotion and the fear of losing himself.

My partner (22f) and I (25m) have been dating for 5 years. She was diagnosed with hormonal imbalances and now our relationship has changed. I feel insecure in my inability to please her – AITAH for wanting to leave due to something out of their control?










Dr. Esther Perel, a renowned relationship therapist, often discusses the tension between commitment and desire in long-term partnerships. She highlights that intimacy relies on both emotional connection and sexual vitality, and when one area suffers significantly, the entire structure is stressed. In this scenario, the partner’s cessation of physical intimacy, stemming from medical issues (hormonal imbalances/PCOS), creates a profound void that impacts the self-worth and future orientation of the other partner.
The OP demonstrates high levels of empathy, which, while generally positive, has become a source of personal pain because they feel responsible for their partner’s unhappiness. This dynamic creates a feedback loop: the partner’s misery due to physical changes leads to the OP feeling inadequate or annoyed, which the sensitive partner then detects, reinforcing her negative emotional state. This is a classic example of how unaddressed boundary needs (the need for physical connection) can manifest as resentment, even in highly empathetic individuals. The confusion over whether the issue is medical (PCOS) or relational is a natural defense mechanism to avoid confronting the difficult choice of leaving a caring relationship.
The OP’s actions thus far—offering console and support—are appropriate for a caring partner. However, professional recommendations must focus on establishing clear communication regarding sexual boundaries and future expectations, potentially with professional counseling. The OP needs to acknowledge that maintaining a relationship where a core need is unmet indefinitely is unsustainable for their well-being. A constructive next step involves explicitly discussing a timeline or treatment plan for the physical issues, or otherwise accepting that this relationship might not fulfill the OP’s needs for a shared future involving parenthood and physical connection, necessitating a difficult but honest re-evaluation of commitment.
THE COMMENTS SECTION WENT WILD – REDDIT HAD *A LOT* TO SAY ABOUT THIS ONE.














The individual in this relationship is clearly experiencing deep distress, torn between a strong commitment to their partner and the growing realization that the relationship may not meet their fundamental needs for physical intimacy and future planning. The central conflict lies in balancing empathy and loyalty toward a partner with a medical issue against the personal desire for a specific life path, particularly as external life milestones like marriage and children proceed for their peer group.
If long-term physical intimacy is essential for the person’s fulfillment in a partnership, is it justifiable to prioritize this need over remaining in a committed relationship facing an indefinite medical challenge, or does the depth of empathy and prior commitment obligate them to stay regardless of personal sacrifice?







