He had hoped their shared love of gaming would strengthen their friendship, offering her a chance to play alongside him by selling his old PS5 at a friendly price with the promise of slow repayments. But as months passed without a single payment, the weight of unspoken debts and mounting disappointment grew heavier, especially with her potential pregnancy adding a new layer of complexity and uncertainty.
Torn between understanding her situation and his own financial needs, he faces a painful dilemma: reclaim the console to regain what he’s owed or risk losing both the money and the friendship. In this quiet struggle, he wrestles with guilt, fairness, and the harsh reality of when kindness might be taken for granted.
WIBTA if I took back a console I “sold” to a friend
Dr. Irene S. Levine, a respected psychologist specializing in relationships, often emphasizes that financial transactions between close friends introduce inherent risks to the relationship structure, primarily by blurring the lines between transactional obligations and emotional support.
The situation involves a significant lapse in repayment commitment, moving the arrangement from a generous installment plan to, effectively, an interest-free loan with no maturity date. The poster’s initial action was generous, allowing the friend access to the desired item despite lack of funds. However, the friend has failed to meet even the minimum expectation of providing repayment updates over six months. The poster’s desire to reclaim the asset is a rational response to breached trust and financial necessity, as the console was sold, not gifted. The introduction of a potential pregnancy escalates the emotional complexity, weaponizing potential hardship against the poster’s legitimate financial claim. The advice from mutual friends suggests the social consensus leans towards the poster’s right to recover their asset, as the duration and lack of communication outweigh the initial goodwill.
The poster’s action to retrieve the item, while emotionally difficult, is appropriate from a standpoint of self-preservation and enforcing boundaries regarding debt. To handle similar situations better, the poster should establish clear, written terms (even informal ones) for any future high-value lending or delayed payment arrangements, including a specific timeline for default consequences. A constructive immediate step would be one final, non-accusatory communication stating the need for repayment or return by a firm date, acknowledging the friend’s situation but prioritizing the debt resolution.
AFTER THIS STORY DROPPED, REDDIT WENT INTO MELTDOWN MODE – CHECK OUT WHAT PEOPLE SAID.
If you took it back, she’ll only get mad
The original poster is in a difficult position, torn between the financial need for the money owed and the guilt associated with reclaiming property given as a loan to a friend facing a significant life change. The core conflict lies between honoring a verbal agreement for repayment and accommodating a friend’s potential hardship.
Given the complete lack of repayment over several months and the pending financial uncertainty of a pregnancy, is the poster justified in taking back the console to recoup their loss, or does the established friendship and the friend’s circumstances require the poster to forgive the debt and accept the financial setback?
