In a world where compassion often feels scarce, two siblings found a fragile spark of hope in a tiny, abandoned life. Squish, a helpless newborn cat with unopened eyes, became their beacon of unconditional love and devotion, a symbol of their unwavering kindness amidst the chaos.
Their journey began with a plea on bended knees, a heartwarming testament to the power of empathy and the deep bond that can grow from the smallest, most vulnerable moments. This story is not just about a cat—it’s about the fierce protectiveness and joy that comes from rescuing and caring for a soul in need.
EM tries to poison my cat, because I wouldn’t let her have him
As noted by Dr. Ramani Durvasula, a clinical psychologist specializing in narcissistic abuse, a key characteristic of individuals displaying entitled or narcissistic behaviors is the inability to accept ‘no’ as an answer, often leading to escalating attempts to control outcomes when boundaries are enforced. The entitlement displayed by the Entitled Mother (EM) regarding the cat illustrates this pattern: first demanding the pet, then escalating to the belief that the narrator ‘owed’ her the cat because she asked first.
The motivation behind EM’s actions appears to be rooted in a severe lack of emotional regulation and a profound sense of entitlement, viewing the narrator’s property (the cat) as an extension of her right to possess what she desires. The decision to use the narrator’s epilepsy medication to poison the cat demonstrates a dangerous convergence of entitlement and vindictiveness. This act represents a severe breach of trust, a violation of physical safety (by using the narrator’s medication), and an extreme form of emotional labor withdrawal—punishing the family for not complying with her demand.
The narrator’s response, while reactive due to shock and protective instinct, was appropriate in physically stopping the act (‘Stop’) and defending themselves when physically attacked. A constructive recommendation for handling similar future conflicts, especially with known high-conflict individuals, involves immediate, non-physical de-escalation combined with swift third-party intervention. In this case, involving the parent (Mom) immediately upon seeing the initial demand, rather than waiting for the poisoning attempt, could have established a firmer boundary earlier. Ultimately, the mother’s permanent removal was necessary given the demonstrated threat to life (both pet and potentially the narrator via medication misuse).
AFTER THIS STORY DROPPED, REDDIT WENT INTO MELTDOWN MODE – CHECK OUT WHAT PEOPLE SAID.
![[deleted] Jesus Christ. Like I understand if people are jealous...](https://animalstrend.com/wp-content/uploads/wp-img-cache/2e2352816354f3f8951178baa2a9d2a0.png)
The narrator experienced intense fear and anger upon discovering their step-parent attempting to poison their beloved pet cat using the narrator’s own medication. This action stemmed from the entitled mother’s refusal to accept the denial of her request to take the cat, leading to a drastic and dangerous escalation of conflict within the family home.
Given the extreme nature of the entitled mother’s actions, which moved from verbal demands to an attempted poisoning and physical assault, was the mother’s swift and permanent banishment from the home the only necessary response, or did the severity of the threat warrant involving legal authorities beyond the immediate physical removal?
